By Samat Jain
December 24, 2006 - 9:35pm
Peter Gutmann, a cryptography expert at the University of Auckland, has written a Cost Analysis of Windows Vista, where he discusses how the “content protection” and trusted platform features described in the Microsoft Windows Vista “security” specification will destroy reliability and innovation in the computer hardware industry, as well as make life miserable for us, the users.
Doomsday scenarios like this were brought up when Microsoft Windows XP was about to be released, and though it was enough to make me switch away from Windows to Linux, most of the concerns did not materialize. I don’t know if Vista will be any different of a situation, but if the notion that they definitely want this kind of control (irrespective of whether they can actually do it, or whether the market will let them) doesn’t make anyone who enjoys using their computer want to switch, I don’t know what will.
Like this article? Please support my writing! Flattr my blog (see my thoughts on Flattr), tip me via PayPal, or send me an item from my Amazon wish list.
Want to see more of my writing? Subscribe to
Samat Says' RSS feed







Comments
Permalink Sudarshan on December 24, 2006 - 10:17pm wrote…
This blunder on Microsoft’s part combined with the oppurtunity described here
points to a more linux friendly world
Permalink landis on July 6, 2007 - 9:42am wrote…
While I believe that much of that stuff has changed with the release, it still has the hd/blu-ray protection and does something called ‘shadow copies’ that are difficult for normal users to remove. I use Vista and Ubuntu at work, at home I recently installed Vista on a separate drive for games but use Ubuntu almost exclusively. The ONLY positive experience I’ve been having in Vista is gaming since it actually shuts crap down when you load a game up. My performance is so much better compared to XP. Since I’m not gaming all the time, dual-boot works fine.